Reading
classic pieces of literature is an integral part of any educational structure.
It doesn’t just teach kids new words, or how to read “better”; it introduces
them to various styles of writing and gives them insight into the mind of the
author. It’s not something that can be
removed from the curriculum, but forcing kids to read against their will can be
detrimental as well. There’s a correct way to teach kids using reading, a way
that won’t plant the seeds of Readicide in reluctant kids.
When
you give children more freedom with their reading options, they’ll feel more
comfortable actually reading. This doesn’t mean give them the option of reading
Twilight instead of Of Mice and Men, they won’t learn anything then. The point of
reading in school is for kids to learn, giving them too much freedom with their
novel choices will result in a generation of idiots completely unfamiliar with
anything from a decade ago. Giving them the option of reading between several
specific novels of varying genres can be done correctly if each choice will
expose them to styles that are somehow similar, instead of two wildly different
books that will teach them nothing. They’ll
enjoy reading the book that they
picked out, and they’ll be learning the same information more enthusiastically
than if they were forced to read a book and given no alternatives that they
would better enjoy.
I really like what you said about giving students a choice when they read. I also think that they will enjoy the book if they picked it out more. But I also really like what you said about exchanging "Of Mice And Men" for "Twlight." Altering the syllabus should not mean deleting books of value to replace them with popular books that don't necessarily have a GREAT amount of value. I think there are books available to find a balance between entertainment and value and that's what we have to look for.
ReplyDelete